⚡️Russia Under Attack. Many Destroyed❗️Urgent Message to Putin

Friends, congratulations. Donald Trump changed his political rhetoric, but did not increase pressure against Russia, did not increase weapons for Ukraine, but says: "You can go further ahead, to the borders of 1991 and beyond." But what supports these words? Some European leaders are divided. Some say: "Well, great, look, finally a victory." And they even attribute this political victory to themselves.

And the other part says: "Great, but friends, we are financing the war against Ukraine ourselves, buying Russian energy resources. First.

Second, yes, but apart from words, what has actually changed? What superweapon is going to Ukraine now after the UN General Assembly? None. SN writes that, you know, they are not demanding that Ukraine surrender now.

They are now demanding that Ukraine return its territories. Great, it would seem that is the reason for that. There is an article about Ursula, which supposedly turned Trump's rhetoric upside down.

The Ul Street Journal writes that Zelensky actually met with Trump and told him that we have successes, there is dynamics. Well, plus there are several secret goals.

So Trump also supposedly changed his mind. What is really happening? Let's analyze. This is where the Lavrov talks are. Here we will also put whether the Europeans are ready to shoot down Russian planes or not.

Again, the Europeans are divided. The impression is that this some kind of game for all and against all. Well, and a new article by Zaluzhny: what to do next? What approaches and what to bet on? Let's bring everything together.

Subscribe to this YouTube channel to know what is really happening in the war, in the negotiations. And make a donation.

We are buying a boat for the gourmet. We are dumping. Our part is a million hryvnias. And we have almost reached half of it. You know that later it will be easier to go down the hill, so please, 100, 200, who can 500.

In general, perfect. Great numbers. Please, join in. Today we want to add a little dynamics. Please, I also put in my 10,000. One percent, please, join in too, whoever can and wants.

Ukrainian drones are attacking Novorossiysk. Well, naval drones are simply operating in this place and, in fact, restoring order there. Also in Crimea, two ans The 26th turned a blind eye.

And in fact, Sochi and Tuapse are shouting that Ukrainian drones are flying, they don't know what to do. So Ukraine is now punishing the occupiers.

We see that the dynamics of strikes on Russian territory has really increased. Yes, you all write in the comments: "And where are those big drones? Where are those big missiles that the authorities talked about so well, promoted and, in fact, put on display?" Indeed, this question exists and we see that the Russians are preparing to shell our energy system, so it would be, let's say, about time, because they said that dozens of these missiles are being made per month. Friends, let's get this big saber and beat the occupiers with it, because Russia is preparing for serious attacks on our energy grid.

And now we need to, if we have it, it wasn't just pro-government PR, and if these things really exist, then it's time to get it. But what we can do with drones, Ukraine really does do, and to the maximum.

CNN says that the rhetoric has really changed, but it ends this article. It says that the rhetoric has changed, right? Now they demand not to retreat, but to advance. Now they say: "Come on, Ukraine, show us, we believe in you." Yes, you can.

Well, in a word, they encourage us, like schoolchildren at a football match. Come on, you can do anything. And the question is, what do they give for this, what resources? And CNN ends its article very rhetorically, that they have n't added anything special yet.

But the very change in rhetoric that we talked about yesterday, according to the Telegraph, says that Trump will simply publicly set things up, wash his hands and leave. Here's what an American journalist friend of mine said: "And when does he enter this war? Well, we do n't see that he entered this war, so we can't say that it's going to be very successful either.

But the states are not adding resources, but changing public rhetoric. The Wall Street Journal says that all this is because Zelensky, during the meeting, said that we can return a large part of the territories and that we have some plans that we will implement very soon and create that Magic that we talked about earlier, for example, to end the war by the end of the year. We don't yet know what kind of nonsense Zelensky was telling Trump.

We don't know what will happen there, because it's all happening in a very closed format. The All Street Journal says that Zelensky has indeed presented some plans that could lead to a change on the battlefield. Well, great.

We love plans like this. The only question is what it says that we have great, significant successes. Yes, there are some, but they shouldn't be overestimated either.

The liberation of the territory, as was the case, for example, in 22, is not observed now. But we see the following story. We see that the rhetoric has changed.

Many, a large part of Western politics, see that Trump is washing his hands of it. But again, not taking this chance to change Trump's rhetoric to pressure Russia would also be wrong. The main thing now is that a large part of Western power comes under this change in rhetoric.

She's not in a hurry yet. Although Ursula says she's the one who changed it. She calls there, she forces Trump, she makes deals. Great, we like it.

We love Rosula very much. She was the first to come to us during the war, when the troops were still stationed near Erpin, and she was already walking along Independence Square to the president's office to the sound of sirens and, in fact, carrying the first weapon. Then there was Boris Johnson, then there were senators and congressmen and everyone else.

But Ursula arrived first and offered a helping hand. Yes, she is a bit involved in PR. Maybe she needs him too to maintain her strong position. That's it.

But we can see that the rhetoric has changed, but there is no support in words now, no super support provided. Well, let's put it this way, you can develop conspiracy theories.

We won't do that, maybe something super big is going on there, but so far it doesn't look very, very likely. Most likely, just some kind of political pressure and a change in Trump's rhetoric could, for example, inspire some European partners to help Ukraine, rather than financing Russian energy resources and financing the war.

This was also discussed at the UN, which said, friends, let's say Trump said this, and then European leaders repeated it, saying, listen, well, it really looks ridiculous. that we shout that Russia is attacking, but we ourselves pay it money.

Whose money is she attacking for? The circle has closed. The Europeans are still those cynical players with a double bottom, but when they started flying over them, now Russian drones are flying in Denmark like flies, but no one says anything. Some shout: "Let's shoot them down." Including Ursula saying that let's all get out, we need to do something.

Macron is now playing bad cop. says: "No, we don't need to shoot them down. We won't, I'm against shooting down the Russians." But how is that? Do you understand? There is no policy even within the European Union regarding them. We're not talking about us anymore.

Yes, they want us to drag it out longer, to drag it out until they rearm and somewhere there support us a little bit and finance us. Well, not a little.

Europe is currently the leader in funding, in fact, for which we thank each and every one of them. But to end the war, this may not be enough. To support Trump's bravado, such strong words that Russia is a paper tiger, that Ukraine can win, that Ukraine can win back, this resource is also not enough.

Is this a resource of the West? Yes, there is. Russian frozen assets. Is this a weapon? Yes, there is. And these missiles can be transferred to Ukraine.

Can they shoot down over Kharkov, or even better over Belgorod, so that no one flies towards them? They can, but there is still a lack of political will. Ukraine demonstrates this political will more than anyone else.

Our military and our military strategies certainly do not lend courage. These are really people who fiercely hate Russia and know how to defeat it. But this requires resources.

And now, Zaluzhny's big column in Dzerzhal Tyzhnya was published about this resource, in which he went through the entire war, analyzed major operations, analyzed the counteroffensive of the 22nd, the super-successful counteroffensive of the 23rd, and, in fact, made suggestions, put them on the table. It is clear that this column is studied by Western military strategists, NATO members, and Western military-political leaders.

Because he says: "Look, you need to bet on people, but don't think that the more people you put in the trenches, the faster the victory will be." No, says Zalozhny, the greatest value in this war in Ukraine is people. And he says that the more people we put in the trench, the faster their FPV drones will crash.

And he says: "Fighting is what you and I once said, that we should fight with drones, not with people." And Zaluzhny clearly and thoroughly describes all this point by point. Indeed, this military-political leadership has long been lacking.

In general, there is not enough of it here to make these valuable strategies, changes during war, paradigm shifts during war. Because he says that we humans cannot defeat them now.

But the shift to innovation, the focus on artificial intelligence, the focus on swarms of drones, on semi-robotic and robotic complexes, this is the key to Ukraine's victory. And he says that there were a lot of developments in 23rd.

Then they started shooting in the wrong direction, disappearing, and it seemed like they started focusing on something else. Russia is investing in this.

And he says that today this is a strategic stalemate in the war. This is very reminiscent of the First World War. And they brought in troops, meaning a stalemate, says Zaluzhny.

And he says that you can get out of it by making a breakthrough. Technological breakthrough. Why the deadlock? He says: "Because the forces on the battlefield are equal, although the resources of Russia against Ukraine are actually incomparable. Russia has more of everything.

But thanks to its partners, we quote "Dzerkalo Tyzhnya" Zaluzhny, who says: "Thanks to our partners, we have equalized on the battlefield, but there may not be a super big breakthrough." Yes, somewhere the Russians take small settlements, somewhere we return them, but victory and breakthrough are possible when Ukraine seriously invests in technology, and not just thinks that by simply mobilizing more, we will win more. No.

Just like technology, innovation. And this strategic vision is what is sorely lacking right now. Here is such a column. In addition to this, we see that Rubio met with Lavrov.

We see that right now, American diplomacy is in action, in play. No one is talking about these negotiations yet. Maybe they exist somewhere in some intelligence agencies, but it seems like it hasn't reached the general public, even politicians and diplomats.

As soon as there is information, I will definitely share it with you, but we still see that Trump is not letting go, even when he says that we can get everything back, he first threw us down, then he is now lifting us up. Very often it means nothing.

Very often this can mean that negotiations are taking place behind the scenes. It is clear that the result may or may not be 50x50. And we won't talk about it now and we won't bet on it, but we see that Trump's rhetoric very often serves as an information screen.

And this is how we should approach it. The only stake we can have, what Zaluzhny writes about, is ourselves, our country, our troops, our technologies, our drones, our robots, our artillery, and everything else that Ukraine uses against Russia in order not to fall, to stand firm. Moreover, to win.

And he concludes his article by saying that defeating Russia means forcing Russia or destroying its tools to not influence Ukraine through war. That, friends, is the story.

Please write in the comments what Trump's paradigm shift actually is. Will it lead to the strengthening of Ukraine, or is it just information noise? Please write in the comments. Second.

Is Trump's change in position in words, which he says, more due to Zelensky, Ursula, or is it just Trump's new political strategy? Actually, regarding Trump's new strategy for Russia, because Rubio and Vance say that Trump's patience may end, that Trump's patience is coming to an end, but we have n't seen any action yet. It will soon be a year since Trump began this great peace campaign.

Well, the question is, will it end successfully or not? Again, for us, this is the most important thing because our skin is in the game, as Nasser Taleb wrote, you always make decisions more responsibly when you feel the heat of this game on your own skin. Then you make other decisions.

Therefore, right now, not all parties participating in the negotiations are personally experiencing these decisions. Write it in the comments, friends.

I kindly ask you to join in. We're almost halfway there. Make a donation. We are assembling a combat boat for the gurus to carry out cool special operations at sea and on the Russian coastline on their territory, on our temporarily occupied territory. Because you see that, well, Russian, Ukrainian troops are leading a parade there today, there are drones, boats, and everything you want.

And they do it very, very beautifully and, most importantly, effectively. We like this kind of story. So please make a donation and subscribe to this YouTube channel.

We have 750,000, we are growing to a million. It is our goal to make the Voice of Ukraine heard in Europe. YouTube allows you to translate into 30 languages ​​at once.