Zelensky’s Statement on the Division of Ukraine. Withdrawal of Troops. Changes in Negotiations. Insider Information
and Georgia Maloney, and Macron, and German Chancellor, and Donald Tusk, Polish Prime Minister, British Prime Minister Kirstmer, European Commission President Ursula Fonderlein, and Finnish President Alexander Stoup.
In their statements, they welcomed Trump's efforts to achieve peace in Ukraine, but emphasized that a diplomatic settlement should take place exclusively on terms that guarantee the protection of the key security interests of Ukraine and Europe, including the provision of reliable and effective guarantees that will allow Kyiv to effectively defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity.
emphasized that meaningful negotiations can only take place under conditions of a ceasefire or a significant reduction in the intensity of hostilities. That is, first a ceasefire, then deeper, further negotiations, and then reaching some kind of solution. Putin proposes the opposite, on the contrary, Ukrainians, you leave your territories, and then we will think about what to leave to you and what to keep for ourselves. forever.European leaders confirmed their readiness to support the peace process through diplomatic means, while continuing significant military and financial assistance to Ukraine and maintaining sanctions pressure on Russia.
They emphasized that the path to peace cannot be determined without Ukraine's participation, and internationally recognized borders should not be changed by force. They quote the UN a lot there. They cite how Russia violated the Budapest Memorandum, how Russia violated the UN Charter, how Russia violated the Helsinki Final Act. In short, they say: "Russia's plan to pass a law not to attack Ukraine is laughable, ridiculous, and humiliating, and no one will believe it. " Then Zelensky yesterday retaliated and said: "We will not give Russia the first. I just yesterday spoke with a journalist from the New York Times, he called to comment and said: "Yesterday's morning statement by Zelensky is already a rebuff to Trump's plan. " I say: "No, don't make harsh statements, don't do anything that could disrupt relations between Ukraine and the United States. " Back then, there was a softer statement. Now Zelensky is making a more pro-Ukrainian, more firm statement. But again, this is the time for negotiations and you shouldn't be afraid to offend someone. Armenia, having super bad cards, received guarantees simply by giving up one transport corridor for 100 years to be controlled by the Americans. And they made a super deal. Now they are moving into the EU. Having minimal, as Trump says, cards, they got a positive result. We have super big cards, a trade agreement with Europe. We have a Mineral Agreement with the States. We have the Budapest Memorandum with those, and with those. But they give us something, nothing. Therefore, we should not be ashamed. Yes, we do not need someone else, the press, politicians to harm us, but we should not be afraid to defend our state in diplomatic negotiations. Therefore, today the president's statement is already more significant. He says: "We will not give Russia a second attempt to divide Ukraine, at least the second will be the third. " Everyone sees Putin's tactics clearly. He is afraid of sanctions. He is doing everything to escape from them. He wants to exchange a pause in the war, murders for the legalization of the occupation of our land. He wants to get territorial spoils a second time. He was allowed to take Crimea. This led to the occupation of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions. He did not receive preventive punishment when he gathered a contingent on our borders. This led to a full-scale war, the occupation of part of the territory. Now Putin wants to be forgiven for the seizure of the south of our Kherson region, Zaporizhia, the entire territory of Luhansk region, Donetsk region and Crimea. This second attempt " We will not allow Russia to divide Ukraine, knowing that Russia is second, there is also a third. Therefore, we stand firmly on clear Ukrainian positions. We must end the war with a worthy peace, which will be based on a clear, reliable, security architecture. Our partners are ready to help us with this," Zelenskyy said. Next, about partners. The actual meeting took place in London. Zelensky says Zelensky says they hear her, see the risks, help, but so far without any specifics. It's very similar to this meeting we're seeing. very similar to what we see in the statements of European leaders. Everything seems to be correct, but there is no action yet. There must be more serious, concrete fundamental actions. Our advisors were represented by Yermak and Umerov. On the sidelines was Lemmy, the Foreign Minister, and Jay Dwens, the second person after Trump. And they were actually talking about the upcoming meeting and what would happen there.But in addition to this, we see that Starmer and Macron are saying that they will work closely with Trump before his meeting with Putin and will do just that to set him up and prepare for the risks that may arise.
We discussed recent events, confirmed our unwavering support for Ukraine, including Volodymyr Zelenskyy and efforts aimed at ensuring a just and lasting peace for the Ukrainian people. Special attention was paid to the role of US President Donald Trump in the peace process. The parties welcomed his initiative to cease hostilities and agreed to closely coordinate positions ahead of the Trump-Putin meeting. The White House says, look, we're planning a bilateral meeting, there won't be a trilateral one. At the same time, NBC reports that no, the meeting will not be bilateral. They also do not rule out that they may invite Zelensky, but they say it's a note, not a fact that they will be in the same room.At Camp David, we were once told during an internship at Harvard that they could bring in different warring parties, put them in different rooms, and then the American president would walk between them and try to reconcile their positions.
This format does not exclude these two news items, that they may invite Zelensky, but Putin will not meet with Zelensky for various reasons. Perhaps Putin is afraid that his throat will simply be torn out. Maybe for another reason. Perhaps he does n't want to meet because he believes that winning with Trump is a tactical victory for him. Meeting with Trump is a tactical victory for him. Meeting with Zelensky, a tactical defeat. Well, or anything else. Either he doesn't recognize it, or it's illegitimate. He wants to see Stefanchuk there constantly. Therefore, we now see that the format of the meeting is being decided. 5 days left until the 15th. The Europeans are all making noise, but they haven't given any specifics yet, but everyone is worried, from Britain, the European Union to all individual leaders. Uh, Mobs, uh, Kellogg's daughter, really one of those who consciously sees the situation, says: "Friends, if we behave without putting pressure on Putin, we will lose. If we behave like Churchill did, we may win. " And this is exactly it, this is exactly a very important story. But The Sunday Times is Sunday news. The British newspaper says that the countries from the coalition of the willing do not plan to send their troops to Ukraine. They will focus on strengthening the Ukrainian military-industrial complex. That is, they don't want to give people away. I was writing a big video for you last night.Look there about sending troops and putting pressure on our European partners that they should take action, and not be the ones who are actually, and not be the ones who are actually just working with extras, standing around, watching, everyone is concerned.
Look, there really is a lot being decided right now. Now a lot depends. Yes, negotiations can be disrupted. The second scenario is that they may end with a certain result, which now depends on how our army stands. Second, on how sincerely and professionally our diplomats and politicians will work. Plus, what will our partners do: sit on the stove and eat kalachi, or will they actually get involved more seriously? The meetings are over, the statements are over. Just one small moment, that's not enough right now. Serious statements are needed. When Putin wants to scare them, he says: "Training 2025 in Belarus, that's all, Poland, the Baltic countries are running. " This is not the kind of statement that the Sunday Times should make, that they are not sending troops. On the contrary, the troops are leaving, the nuclear weapons are being returned, and Ukraine is being accepted into NATO. Then Putin retreats, lowers his position, and then a normal, constructive, pro-Ukrainian, pro-European dialogue emerges. Write in the comments whether our partners are doing enough. Make a donation, subscribe to this channel. Take care of yourself, take care of your loved ones. See you later.