DBr Investigates Former ‘Ukrenergo’ Head: Court Decisions Tell a Different Story
The investigation initiated by the State Bureau of Investigation (DBR) into former ‘Ukrenergo’ chief Vladimir Kudritsky is gaining new nuances.
Meanwhile, an analysis of open court records reveals that investigators may have fewer grounds for their claims than initially appears.
This is evidenced by a detailed review of specific cases where ‘Ukrenergo’ successfully secured court rulings in their favor for recovering over 17 million hryvnias in case №906/283/21.
The case involves an advance payment of 8.8 million hryvnias transferred to ‘Vizin Rich.’ Ukrainian courts confirmed the legitimacy of ‘Ukrenergo’s’ actions, ruling to recover the funds and penalty interest from ‘Vizin Rich’ and its guarantor, ‘Concord’ bank.
All major decisions were made back in 2020, with the process of enforcement lasting over a year due to the company’s efforts to execute bank guarantees.
Significantly, details show that ‘Ukrenergo’s’ actions were lawful, demonstrating its ability to defend its interests in court.
Why then does the DBR pursue accusations, and why do their arguments contradict established court rulings? The question remains open, but the court practice affirms the legality of the company’s actions in this case.
For more information, please refer to the author’s articles available via the provided link.