Changes in Ukrainian Public Attitudes Toward Government Criticism During Wartime: Increased Openness and Civic Activism
In recent months, significant shifts have occurred in the public consciousness of Ukraine regarding attitudes toward criticizing the government, especially during ongoing wartime.
According to comprehensive survey results conducted by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology from September 19 to October 5, 2025, over 90% of Ukrainians believe that criticizing the government is necessary and justified even in times of war.
This challenges the notion of the inviolability of the authorities during crises and emphasizes the importance of active civic engagement.
Notably, the percentage of those who consider criticizing the government entirely unacceptable has decreased from 13% in 2024 to 8% in 2025.
A majority of respondents (58%) insist that criticism should be balanced and constructive to avoid destabilizing the country, while only 32% advocate for harsh and uncompromising critique.
Citizens also recognize the need for responsible expression, understanding that balanced criticism can contribute to strengthening the state.
Regarding anti-corruption efforts, 56% believe that the government is genuinely striving to combat this deep-rooted problem, whereas 40% feel that Ukraine remains hopelessly corrupt.
Overall, perceptions of progress in fighting corruption have improved compared to 2024, although the figures are still below 2023 levels, when 59% viewed the situation more optimistically.
A significant segment of Ukrainians supports various forms of critique: 45% demand unwavering criticism of authorities in the context of hopeless corruption, while 46% favor constructive dialogue and systemic improvements.
This indicates a rise in civic activity and desire for change even under challenging circumstances.
The survey was conducted via phone interviews with a random sample of mobile numbers, encompassing 1008 Ukrainian citizens aged 18 and older, residing on territories under Ukrainian control.
Participants included only those not located in occupied zones or temporarily uncontrolled areas, as well as internally displaced persons (IDPs) who moved from occupied regions.
The statistical margin of error for this sample is under 4.1%, and the results allow for high-precision conclusions regarding societal mood and political activism amid wartime conditions.