Hidden Schemes of the Global Arms Industry: How the US, Europe, and Ukraine Collaborate on Military Contracts and Security Guarantees
In the contemporary landscape of international relations, Ukraine’s defense sector finds itself at the heart of complex and multifaceted processes with global implications.
Recent investigations and expert assessments reveal that the influence and financing mechanisms of the arms industry are rooted much deeper than initially apparent.
Beginning with a scheme where weapons are resold through Europe and then delivered to Ukraine with a 10% markup, both the United States and European nations play dual roles in this intricate game.
According to US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, some of the profits generated through this process could potentially be channeled into funding security guarantees for Ukraine, especially concerning future military support.
Nevertheless, this highly convoluted scheme raises numerous questions about transparency and underlying motives.A significant aspect of the ongoing story is that the US, together with NATO countries, is rolling out a mechanism to supply weaponry funded solely by voluntary contributions from partner nations.
Currently, European allies have pledged to provide Ukraine with over a billion dollars worth of military equipment.
However, the issue of security guarantees for Ukraine remains unresolved.
Recent statements from US and European officials suggest various scenarios: from creating something akin to NATO’s Article 5 to the risks of U.S.
involvement in a broader conflict should Russia decide to apply force against Ukrainian peacekeepers.
Moscow has already reacted sharply to any security assurances, while experts warn about the potential consequences of such approaches.
Notably, nearly ten countries have expressed readiness to deploy their troops in Ukraine, though official confirmation of their direct involvement has yet to be announced.All these developments highlight that global politics surrounding the Ukraine conflict are crossing new boundaries, raising ongoing questions about justice, transparency, and the balance of power.
Meanwhile, the prospect of establishing and maintaining security guarantees for Ukraine remains open and continues to provoke diverse opinions and forecasts.