Ukraine’s Army Trapped by Soviet Habits: Can It Overcome Internal Challenges and Halt Russian Aggression?
After three years of fighting against Russian aggression, Ukraine’s military leadership faces deep-rooted internal problems that date back to the Soviet era.
During the first year of full-scale invasion, Ukrainian defenders displayed remarkable ingenuity and adaptability, often relying on improvisation and quick-thinking to gain tactical edges on the battlefield.
However, over time and under the pressure of traditional top-down command structures, Soviet-style habits have re-emerged within the Ukrainian armed forces.
This shift has led to increased casualties, morale decline, and weakened defensive capabilities, all while Russia continues its relentless pursuit of conquest, reaffirming its numerical and technological advantages.
Internally, the military struggles with bureaucratic culture that hampers swift tactical decision-making.
Experts and commanders emphasize the urgent need for comprehensive reform, advocating for decentralized command akin to NATO standards, empowering frontline units and promoting modern military practices.
Many soldiers sense that fear of orders and accountability paralyze initiative, resulting in chaotic retreats or ineffective attacks.
Meanwhile, Russian troops, often disregarding human losses and operating under strict hierarchical discipline, are able to hold their positions longer, at least temporarily.
Ukrainian forces are compelled to innovate and alter their strategies swiftly in response.
Additionally, some units are beginning to adopt Western-style training and tactical approaches, integrating modern technology and command structures.
Despite considerable difficulties, Ukraine continues to learn from NATO models, aiming to modernize its army and reduce reliance on Soviet inheritance.
Yet, substantial challenges remain: entrenched hierarchies, a climate of fear, and resource limitations threaten to impede progress.
The internal struggle reflects the broader battle for Ukraine’s evolution towards a more democratic and efficient military system, necessary for winning the ongoing war against Russia.