Iran seeks to return to nuclear negotiations with the USA: new reports and potential scenarios for development
According to credible sources, including American and European experts, Tehran is entering a new phase of diplomatic dialogue aimed at resuming negotiations concerning its nuclear program. Reports circulated by The Wall Street Journal and cited by "European Pravda" indicate that Iranian representatives, through Arab mediators, have conveyed a key message to regional and Western actors: the country is ready to return to the negotiating table. At the same time, these sources state that Iran insists that the USA and Israel cease their escalation of violence and agree to a diplomatic solution to the conflict. Currently, Tehran emphasizes in its statements that it is prepared for dialogue "if Washington does not participate in Israel’s military operation in Palestine." This is one of the key conditions, as Iran seeks to avoid further escalation of the conflict and maintain options for future negotiations. Additionally, sources note that Iran has considered that halting active military actions would allow it to gain a "breathing period" — an opportunity to regroup forces and strengthen its position on the international stage. An important element of this diplomatic mosaic is Iran’s strategic interest in preserving the ability to maintain advantages in its nuclear program. According to reports from Arab diplomats, Iran is contemplating the possibility of accelerating uranium enrichment and expanding its nuclear activities if talks with the USA do not show prospects for a swift revival. This situation raises concerns among regional and Western experts, as such steps could complicate any diplomatic resolution and heighten regional tensions. Interestingly, in the context of recent events, it is worth noting that as of mid-last week, diplomatic efforts by the Donald Trump administration were effectively paused. Iran’s refusal to continue the negotiation process even before the latest wave of conflicts triggered by Israeli military escalation in the Middle East came as a surprise. It is known that, on the eve, Iran rejected the possibility of resuming dialogue with Washington, clarifying that its position was influenced by US support for Israeli military actions and sanctions policy. On the other hand, experts remind us that during Trump’s active diplomatic period, the United States attempted to re-enter the nuclear deal with Tehran — efforts that were halted by Iran’s firm stance on uranium enrichment and its nuclear program. However, after President Joe Biden’s administration committed to returning to the nuclear agreement, negotiations also stalled. An important context is that Iranian officials have indicated that Western support remains uncertain, and any new escalation could lead to even greater conflict. Just previously, high-level diplomatic circles floated statements suggesting that a deal between Iran and Israel might be possible — not only in terms of regional stability but also within broader international diplomatic efforts. Former US President Donald Trump, on social media platform Truth Social, emphasized that only he could facilitate peace between these countries. His words convey hope that diplomacy might become the only way to stabilize the situation, yet all parties understand that the current situation remains complex and unpredictable. In summary, it can be concluded that Iran’s diplomatic approach towards the USA reflects both the possibility and the desire to resume talks; however, at present, fears of further escalation and factors complicating diplomatic dialogue take precedence. It is possible that the most critical issues — decisions regarding the nuclear program, direct actions by Israel, and Iran’s responses — will again become focal points of international attention, underscoring the complexity and multiplicity of voices in modern global and regional negotiations.