The Supreme Court of Poland intends to review the vote count in the presidential elections that shook the country’s political and social scene last month
This decision was made in response to requests and complaints from opposition forces and candidates’ representatives, who drew attention to possible violations and anomalies during the voting process. According to the official information adopted on June 11, 2025, the Supreme Court authorized a recount of votes in several polling stations that raised suspicions. This step was a response by the judges to numerous complaints and statements about potential violations at specific polling stations, especially those where unusual or disputed results were recorded. Court officials have stated that the recount will be conducted in 13 election commissions, with the goal of establishing the true number of votes cast for individual candidates during the voting on June 1, 2025. The plan is for the recount to be carried out with the assistance of relevant district courts, ensuring maximum fairness and objectivity in clarifying and confirming the results. This decision stems from concerns about transparency and the legitimacy of the presidential elections in the country, as even minor violations during vote counting can undermine public trust in the democratic process. According to reports appearing in the media, suspicions of anomalies had already arisen after the second round of elections, particularly at certain commissions. One such situation occurred in Białystok-Mazowiecki, where reports indicated vote result manipulations. Local authorities confirmed the occurrence of such an anomaly and attributed it to technical errors but noted that the case would be forwarded to law enforcement agencies for further investigation. This development was a logical consequence of previous cases, including in Kraków, which also had their own nuances. Sources in the media indicated that violations were detected in several election commissions; however, their impact on the final results was minimal. The difference between the two main candidates, Karol Nawořcki and Rafał Trzaskowski, was over 369,000 votes. Nawořcki received more than 10,606,000 votes, while his opponent garnered over 10,237,000. This means that even if ballot manipulations occurred, their overall results remained quite stable, supporting the confidence in their competitiveness. In light of these events, Prime Minister Donald Tusk promised to conduct a thorough investigation into potential violations and falsifications during the election. He emphasized that the authorities would do everything possible to clarify all circumstances and ensure transparency of the process, considering the importance of honest elections for the country’s institutional stability and Poland’s international reputation. On social media and among analysts, discussions already revolve around the possible impact of these new court decisions on the presidential race and internal politics. Moreover, experts highlight that these steps indicate growing attention to the security and transparency of the electoral process in Poland, which is vital for strengthening democratic institutions and public trust in the voting system. Additionally, this situation raises questions about trust in election results and the role of the judicial system in ensuring electoral integrity. The results of the recount are expected to be announced shortly in accordance with established procedures. These events again demonstrate that in modern democracies, the electoral process remains a highly sensitive sphere that requires maximum responsibility and transparency from all participants.