Donald Trump expressed approval of Operation “Web,” a secret Ukrainian-American special operation aimed at destroying strategic Russian aircraft, which he described as “cool” and “very powerful
" This was reported by reputable sources from the American publication Axios, citing their own anonymous informants. According to their analysis, the former U.S. President speaks about this operation in enthusiastic terms and actively endorses it. At the same time, the interlocutors note that Trump, when in public, remained restrained and even suppressed his emotions regarding the direct conflict and Ukraine’s aggression, considering the diplomatic sensitivity of the situation. Concerning his internal feelings, an anonymous source from his circle emphasized that Trump was "delighted" with the operation. One of his trusted aides even described how the president engaged in approval with an intuitive enthusiasm: "Quite strongly — he considers this operation to be cool." Another source added that Trump, reacting compassionately to news about the special operation, was completely satisfied with its level and scope. Informational sources report that one of Trump’s aides compared the Ukrainian drone attack to "a chihuahua loudly biting a much larger dog." This means that, according to previously voiced analysts, even small actions contribute to significant battlefield consequences and influence the strategic situation in the region. Meanwhile, within the circles of the American leadership, there have been considerable concerns about the possible consequences of the Ukrainian attack. According to several well-informed sources, in recent days Trump has discussed with his advisors the potential escalation, warning that Ukrainian drone actions could provoke a very serious response from the Kremlin. Specifically, he is likely concerned that Vladimir Putin’s response to the strikes could be large-scale and lead to even more intense fighting — including the use of strategic aircraft capable of carrying nuclear weapons. One high-ranking official stated that this could negatively impact the diplomatic process, causing a rollback from the first direct negotiations between Ukraine and Russia in three years. "We have a clear desire for de-escalation and ending the war," he said. "But if Putin reacts aggressively, the president might suspect that the opponent's measures will escalate the conflict." Thus, in this situation, Trump, according to him, fears losing the chance for a diplomatic breakthrough and the opportunity to find a peaceful resolution. Another factor causing concern is the possibility that an attack by Ukrainian drones on strategic bombers capable of carrying nuclear weapons could sharply change the balance of power in the region and complicate Russia’s nuclear deterrence. According to U.S. officials, this move is a highly dangerous moment that could lead to unpredictable consequences in a multi-vector conflict situation. Although Trump notes that it was not surprising to him that Ukrainian forces used drones, he briefly emphasized that such actions are understood as a natural response during wartime. "This is what happens when war continues," he said. At the same time, he expressed concern that such events only lead to an increase in hostilities and prolong the conflict. "We very much want this to end, for fighting to stop, and therefore any new escalation causes me disappointment and anxiety," he added. Despite his support for Operation "Web," Trump maintains a critical attitude toward its implications for global security and strategic stability. In conversations with close associates and colleagues, he positively reviews the notable results of this operation, acknowledging that it substantially strengthened Ukrainian defenses and became a vivid example of modern military skill. However, he also emphasizes that events of such scale can only complicate the political and military climate in the region. Additionally, in Trump’s view, ongoing war and active Ukrainian actions could further increase the risks for the entire international community. This assertion is also supported by warnings from U.S. military officials, who emphasize that such strikes, especially on strategically important targets, could have far-reaching consequences for security. In summary, the former president’s reaction shows that even when expressing approval of a specific military operation, he remains attentive to its potential additional risks and political complications because, in such a war, nothing is simply good or bad. In light of recent events, the ongoing debate about the balance between military success and risks to global security continues to be a central topic among officials and analysts alike.