The Kremlin assures that the explosion near the Crimean Bridge did not cause any serious damage, and the object itself remains intact and is operating normally
However, Ukrainian intelligence agencies report differently, claiming that this explosion was just one episode in a coordinated operation targeting a strategic facility, a level of complexity that is live-confirmed by data obtained from several sources. During a press conference, Dmitry Peskov, the spokesperson for the Russian president, acknowledged that there was an explosion near the bridge built by the occupiers, but assured that it did not cause significant destruction. According to the Kremlin representative, "there was indeed an explosion, but no damage was done to the bridge, and it continues its operation without interruption." These statements appear to be an attempt to minimize the significance of the event and to reassure Russians and the world about the stability and safety of this strategically important infrastructure. However, this information conflicts with data provided by Ukrainian security agencies, which report that on the morning of June 3, a third targeted strike was carried out against the Crimean Bridge. According to the Security Service of Ukraine, this time they used underwater explosive devices — an operation carried out as part of prolonged and carefully planned preparation. At 4:44 a.m., Ukrainian special forces detonated explosives planted under the bridge supports. Available information indicates that the blast's power was approximately 1,100 kilograms of TNT equivalent, causing significant damage to the structures on the seabed beneath the bridge. As a result of this and previous operations, the bridge is in an emergency condition, with a risk of further destruction and operational disruption. Earlier attacks already inflicted substantial damage, raising serious concerns among the occupying authorities, who attempt to present the situation as alarming but controlled. The third underwater strike demonstrates the high level of Ukrainian special operations’ capability to conduct meticulously planned actions in complex conditions. It is reported that planning these strikes required significant effort and precision, with the operational strategy personally coordinated by the head of the SBU, Lieutenant General Vasyl Malyuk, who was involved in developing tactics and managing all phases of the operations. Thanks to a detailed approach and a high level of professionalism, the operations were carried out without civilian casualties, which is especially valued in wartime conditions. Against the backdrop of Ukrainian intelligence reports, questions remain for the aggressor state regarding the potential consequences of these detonations. Kremlin officials are attempting to downplay the incident’s significance, but evidence confirming the bridge's destruction clearly indicates that its strategic integrity is already in question. While the Russian side insists everything is under control and that there was no explosion, Ukrainian intelligence shows a different scenario, reflecting a high level of tension and ongoing efforts to maintain control over key objects in the occupied territories. This so-called "military theater" is increasingly becoming an arena not only for military confrontation but also for informational warfare, where each side strives to gain the upper hand in the battle for international recognition and psychological influence. Meanwhile, the situation with the Crimean Bridge leaves many open questions about the future of the region and possible new actions by Ukrainian special services in the ongoing struggle to liberate occupied territories.