The Dismissal of High-Ranking SBU Official: Anatoliy Loif Removed from Position Following Scandalous Incident

Chas Pravdy - 09 May 2025 23:21

In a significant personnel decision that unexpectedly shook Ukrainian security agencies, Anatoliy Loif, head of the Main Directorate for Counterintelligence Support of Critical Infrastructure and Counter-Terrorism Financing, was dismissed from his post. This move resulted from an internal investigation initiated by the agency’s leadership and became one of the main security news stories in recent days. According to the SBU press service, the official termination of Loif’s appointment was made by the agency’s leadership, including the Head of the Security Service of Ukraine, which was confirmed in a statement to Ukrainska Pravda. They emphasized that this was a "deliberate and justified step" aimed at strengthening the security service’s work and removing possible risks within personnel. Overall, this incident has garnered broad media attention and raised numerous questions about internal processes within the SBU, especially in the context of recent scandals involving certain staff members. The head of the department responsible for counterintelligence of critical infrastructure and counter-terrorism financing was relieved of duty during a period when, according to sources, internal disruptions and conflicts had started to surface within the agency. The background of this incident is quite unexpected. In early March, according to Ukrainska Pravda, a number of SBU employees, including Anatoliy Loif, celebrated Konstantin Kolomiiets’s birthday in the evening — a person unofficially linked to the protection of the owner of the sanctioned bookmaker "Parimatch," Serhiy Porthnoy. This seemingly minor episode reportedly became one of the starting points for subsequent personnel decisions. Media speculation and theories have already appeared regarding how this incident might have influenced the internal situation within the security structure and the level of trust in the SBU leadership. However, official sources currently limit their statements to short confirmations that Loif’s dismissal was a decision made by the higher leadership of the service aimed at increasing efficiency and ensuring the country’s security interests. Recall that Anatoliy Loif held his position for quite some time and was responsible for critical areas such as counterterrorism, protection of vital facilities, and counteracting external threats. His removal raises questions about further personnel rotations within the service, possible revisions of internal procedures, and highlights the importance of transparency and professional selection within the agency. Overall, the situation once again confirms that Ukraine’s national security and law enforcement spheres are in a constant state of transformation and reform aimed at cleaning up and enhancing effectiveness. At the same time, it underscores the importance of internal discipline, transparency, and accountability of every employee in safeguarding the sovereignty and security of the state. Regarding future steps, security agencies anticipate not only personnel reshuffles but also internal reforms that will root out corruption, abuse of power, or breaches of ethical standards. Civic oversight also plays a crucial role — it can encourage investigations and ensure transparency in management processes related to Ukraine’s security sector. In general, the case of Anatoliy Loif emphasizes once more that Ukrainian intelligence and law enforcement agencies must be as open as possible to change and raising working standards — because their efficiency directly affects the country’s overall security.

Source