Here’s the translation of your text into English:
--- Klychko sheds light on his statement regarding Ukraine’s possible temporary relinquishment of some territories Kyiv’s city leadership and Vitali Klitschko have once again found themselves at the center of political debates surrounding his recent remarks about the potential temporary surrender of occupied Ukrainian territories in pursuit of peace. After discussions in international media and a wave of criticism, the Kyiv mayor explained his position in detail during an interview with the British broadcaster BBC, emphasizing that he does not advocate for permanently ceding land but rather justifies the possibility of such a scenario based on the political realities and complex challenges of the current war. In his BBC interview, Vitali Klitschko stated that his words had been misunderstood or taken out of context. “Perhaps, we need to clarify. In my interview, I was specifically talking about how Ukrainian leadership and the entire people might be offered options — where, in the name of peace, they may have to make temporary concessions — including relinquishing certain territories,” the Kyiv mayor explained. He assured that he was referring only to a hypothetical scenario currently under discussion at the international level, including among political circles and in the media. Klitschko added that during the interview he underscored Ukraine’s unwavering stance — that, as before, the Ukrainian people will not allow Russian occupation to become a permanent part of our history. “We understand that any territorial concessions would contradict our national interests and values — and fighting against this must continue to the last, making every effort both on our part and with the support of our European partners,” Klitschko emphasized. Earlier, during another interview with BBC, he repeatedly mentioned a possible scenario he calls “temporary” — a surrender of the occupied territories. According to him, this step could serve as a short-term solution for establishing peace, but he also stressed that the Ukrainian people will never accept this idea permanently. “It’s unfair and excessively painful, but we are prepared to consider such an option as temporary. Achieving peace requires readiness for difficult compromises, even if they cause internal strife,” Klitschko stated. The conflict situation is intensifying, and many experts assume that these discussions are part of a broader political scenario that could lead to shifts in power dynamics and diplomatic efforts towards ending the war. It’s no secret that President Volodymyr Zelensky is currently under pressure from escalated hostilities and the need to find compromise solutions capable of ending the war in the shortest possible time. At the same time, he has not publicly rushed to comment on possible concessions or gradual surrender to the aggressor, with a particular emphasis on repeating that Ukraine will fight for its independence and sovereignty until the end. Regarding rumors and discussions in political circles, Klitschko noted that he has no information about any preliminary agreements or private negotiations with the country’s leadership concerning so-called “painful decisions.” “Zelensky is doing his job — it’s his responsibility, and I have no grounds to interfere in his strategic decisions,” he said, hinting that the final decision on such complex issues depends solely on the president and his team. Overall, Klitschko’s words highlight the complexity and delicacy of Ukraine’s diplomatic situation. This once again demonstrates that the country is going through a period of serious trials, where even the top politicians must weigh every word carefully and forecast the consequences of their statements. At the same time, it opens a discussion about how feasible compromise is in conducting a war and maintaining territorial integrity amid modern military conflicts and international pressures. It is important to remember that any scenario, regardless of diplomatic optimism, involves significant difficulties and a price that the Ukrainian people and the entire country will have to pay to preserve their independence and future. ---